The data report within GTN-P is facilitated through the involvement of National Correspondents which have been nominated by their country. These persons are associated with major observing systems and they are representing their nations within the decision‐making at the GTN‐P coordination level.
Excerpt from the GTN-P strategy and implementation plan:
NATIONAL CORRESPONDENTS | ORGANIZATION | COUNTRY | |
Dario Trombotto | IANIGLA-CCT CONICET | Argentina | This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. |
Claudia Riedl | Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik | Austria | claudia.riedl(at)zamg.ac.at |
Carlos Ernesto Schaefer | Universidade Federal de Viçosa | Brazil | carlos.schaefer(at)ufv.br |
Antoni Lewkowicz | University of Ottawa | Canada | alewkowi(at)uOttawa.ca |
Louis-Philippe Roy | YukonU research Centrea - Permafrost and geoscience, Yukon University |
Canada | lroy(at)YukonU.ca |
Huijun Jin | Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences | China | hjjin(at)lzb.ac.cn |
Qingbai Wu | Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences | China | qbwu(at)lzb.ac.cn |
Lin Zhao | Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, CAS | China | linzhao(at)lzb.ac.cn |
Luo Dongliang | Northwest Institute of Eco-environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences | China | luodongliang(at)lzb.ac.cn |
Thomas Ingeman-Nielsen | Technical University of Denmark | Denmark | tin(at)byg.dtu.dk |
Jan Hjort | Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu | Finland | Jan.Hjort(at)oulu.fi |
Xavier Bodin | Laboratoire EDYTEM, CNRS / Université de Savoie | France | xavier.bodin(at)univ-savoie.fr |
Philippe Schoeneich | Institut de Géographie Alpine | France | philippe.schoeneich(at)univ-grenoble-alpes.fr |
Michael Krautblatter | Technische Universität München | Germany | m.krautblatter(at)tum.de |
William Cable | Alfred Wegener Institute | Germany | Bill.Cable(at)awi.de |
Mauro Guglielmin | Insubria University | Italy | mauro.guglielmin(at)uninsubria.it |
Atsushi Ikeda | University of Tsukuba | Japan | aikeda(at)geoenv.tsukuba.ac.jp |
Mamoru Ishikawa | Hokkaido University | Japan | mishi(at)ees.hokudai.ac.jp |
Ryskul Usubaliev | Central-Asian Institute of Applied Geosciences | Kyrgyz Republic | r.usubaliev(at)caiag.kg |
Jamabaljav Yamkhin | Mongolia | jambaljav(at)gmail.com | |
Ko van Huissteden | VU University, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences | Netherlands | j.van.huissteden(at)vu.nl |
Tanya O'Neill | Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research | New Zealand | Tanya.o'neill(at)waikato.ac.nz |
Fraser Morgan | Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research | New Zealand | MorganF(at)landcareresearch.co.nz |
Hanne H. Christiansen | The University Centre in Svalbard, UNIS | Norway | hanne.christiansen(at)unis.no |
Ketil Isaksen | Norwegian Meteorological Institute | Norway | ketil.isaksen(at)met.no |
Grzegorz Rachlewicz | Institute of Geoecology and Geoinformation Adam Mickiewicz University | Poland | grzera(at)amu.edu.pl |
Gonçalo Vieira | CEG/IGOT - University of Lisbon | Portugal | vieira(at)edu.ulisboa.pt |
Pedru Urdea | Universitatea de Vest, Facultatea de Chimie, Biologie, Geografie | Romania | urdea(at)cbg.uvt.ro |
Dmitry Drozdov | Earth Cryosphere Institute | Russia | ds_drozdov(at)mail.ru |
Dmitry Sergeev | IEG RAS | Russia | sergueevdo(at)mail.ru |
Michael Zheleznyak | Laboratory of Permafrost Geothermics, Melinkov Permafrost Institute | Russia | fe1956(at)mail.ru |
Pavel Konstantinov | Permafrost Institute SB RAS | Russian Federation | konst109y(at)yandex.ru |
Galina Malkova | Earth Cryosphere Institute SB RAS | Russian Federation | galina_malk(at)mail.ru |
Sang-Jong Park | Korea Polar Research Institute | South Korea | sangjong(at)kopri.re.kr |
Miguel Ángel de Pablo Hernández | Departament of Geology, Geography and Environment Science, University of Alcalá | Spain | miguelangel.depablo(at)uah.es |
Margareta Johansson | Lund University/Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences | Sweden | margareta.johansson(at)nateko.lu.se |
Reynald Delaloye | University of Fribourg | Switzerland | reynald.delaloye(at)unifr.ch |
Tristam C. Hales | Sustainable Places Research Institute and Reader, University of Cardiff | United Kingdom | HalesT(at)cardiff.ac.uk |
Alexander Kholodov | Permafrost Laboratory, University of Alaska, Fairbanks | USA | alkholodov(at)alaska.edu |
Frank Urban | USGS | USA | furban(at)usgs.gov |
YOUNG NATIONAL CORRESPONDENTS | ORGANIZATION | COUNTRY | |
Ingo Hartmeyer |
GEORESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft | Austria | ingo.hartmeyer(at)georesearch.ac.at |
Ferestheh Ghiami Shomami | Carleton University | Canada | fereshtehghiamishom(at)cmail.carleton.ca |
Katerine Grandmont | Department of Geography, Université de Montréal | Canada | katerine.grandmont(at)umontreal.ca |
Michaela Kňažková | Department of Geography at Masaryk University, Brno | Czech Republic | 263032(at)mail.muni.cz |
Olli Karjalainen | Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu | Finland | olli.karjalainen(at)oulu.fi |
Florence Magnin | PermaFrance | France | florence.magnin(at)univ-smb.fr |
Saskia Eppinger | Technische Universität München | Germany | saskia.eppinger(at)tum.de |
Graham Gilbert | The University Centre in Svalbard | Greenland | grahamg(at)unis.no |
Murataly Duishonakunov | Department of Physical Geography, Kyrgyz National University | Kyrgyz Republic | dmuratalyt(at)mail.ru |
Sarah Strand | University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS) | Svalbard | sarah.strand(at)unis.no |
Krzysztof Rymer | Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań | Poland | krzysztof.rymer(at)wp.pl |
Joana Baptista | CEG/IGOT-University of Lisbon | Portugal | joana-baptista1(at)edu.ulisboa.pt |
Alexey Maslakov | Lomonosov Moscow State University | Russia | alekseymaslakov(at)yandex.ru |
Ruben Ramos Nieto | Departament of Geology, Geography and Environment Science, University of Alcalá | Spain | rubes.ramosn(at)edu.uah.es |
Cécile Pellet | PERMOS | Switzerland | cecile.pellet(at)unifr.ch |
Kelsey Nyland | George Washington University | USA | This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. |
The Strategy and Implementation Plan for the Global Terrestrial Network on Permafrost (GTN-P) is presented by the International Permafrost Association (IPA) to the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) and the Global Terrestrial Observing System (GTOS). It was prepared by the Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost Task Force, chaired by Dr. H. H. Christiansen and reviewed by two anonymous reviewers and by the GTN-P Executive Committee.
Download Strategy and Implementation Plan 2012-2016
ISSN 2410-7662
Key title: Strategy and implementation plan (Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost)
Here, you find a permafrost link list.
All about frozen ground - comprehensive and well written information on permafrost provided by the National Snow & Ice Data Center giving an excellent overview of the interrelations of permafrost and climate, ecology, and people and much more. A good read when you are just starting to learn about permafrost.
PAGE21 Infographics and more - a set of very good descriptive graphics explaining the formation of permafrost features, coastal erosion, microbial activity and remote sensing.
Permafrost in Alaska, U.S.A. - Permafrost Lab Website
Permafrost in Canada - Interview with permafrost scientist Sharon Smith
Permafrost in the Alps - the alpine-wide permafrost monitoring network permaNET
Permafrost in Russia - Description of Russian Permafrost by Vladimir Kotlyakov and Tatyana Khromova
Permafrost in Mongolia - Abstract of the second international symposium on mountain and arid land permafrost
Permafrost in Norway - Description of the Norwegian permafrost database NORPERM
Permafrost in Sweden - An article about a newly discovered microbe found in the thawing permafrost of a mire in North Sweden
Permafrost in Antarctica - An article discussiong the issue of permafrost melting faster than expected in Antarctica
Here you find an overview on international monitoring components (CALM, TSP) managed within the GTN-P database and global monitoring systems (DUE Permafrost, FLUXNET, INTERACT).
Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost (GTN-P)
Circumpolar Active Layer Monitoring (CALM)
Thermal State of Permafrost (TSP)
Data User Element (DUE) Permafrost
![]() |
PAGE21 Work Package 8 |
The PAGE21 project comprises eight Work Packages. Work package 8 focusses on data management within the PAGE21 project, encompassing data mining, data integration, data archiving, and data dissemination. One goal is to set up a data management system by building on existing frameworks.
However, the existing data was far from being homogeneous: different countries follow different standards, there was no framework for data reporting or archival and data documentation incomplete. As a result, and despite the utmost relevance of permafrost in the Earth climate system, the data has not been used by as many researchers as intended by the initiators of these global programs. While the monitoring of many other Essential Climate Variables has been tackled by organized international networks (e.g. FLUXNET), there was no central database for all permafrost-related parameters.
![]() |
Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost |
The Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost (GTN-P) was initiated and is managed by the International Permafrost Association (IPA) since 1998 on behalf of the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) and the Global Terrestrial Observing System (GTOS). Its purpose is to organize and manage a global network of permafrost obs
ervatories for detecting, monitoring, and predicting climate change and it was outfitted with an "open data policy" (i.e. all data is freely available via the World Wide Web).The monitoring of permafrost temperatures, active-layer thicknesses and other parameters has been performed for several decades already, but it was brought together within the GTN-P in the 1990’s only.
The GTN-P database is the one-stop shop for permafrost monitoring parameters where the researcher can find data, metadata and information of all relevant parameters for a specific site. The network’s two international monitoring components are:
![]() |
Circumpolar Active Layer Monitoring (CALM) |
The data is accompanied by information about elevation, vegetation, landform and occasional soil moisture data.
The primary goal of the CALM program is to observe the response of the active layer and near-surface permafrost to climate change over long (multi-decadal) time scales. The CALM observational network, established in the 1990s and hosted at the George Washington University (Washington D.C., USA), observes the long-term response of the active layer and near-surface permafrost to changes and variations in climate at more than 200 sites in both Hemispheres. The majority of sites measure active-layer thickness on grids ranging from 1 ha to 1 km², and observe soil temperatures. For each site, metadata forms exists with information on location, elevation, slope and aspect, responsible investigator, geomorphology, landscape, vegetation, soils, additional measurements at the site (e.g. temperature, soil moisture, snow cover), and closest climate station (with some values, e.g. mean annual air temperature).Most sites in the CALM network are located in Arctic and Subarctic lowlands. The broader impacts of this project are derived from the hypothesis that widespread, systematic changes in the thickness of the active layer could have profound effects on the flux of greenhouse gases, on the human infrastructure in cold regions, and on landscape processes. It is therefore critical that observational and analytical procedures continue over decadal periods to assess trends and detect cumulative, long-term changes. Since 2009 CALM is part of the NSF Arctic Observing Network (AON) Program (Project ARC-1002119). In the Arctic and Subarctic lowland of the Northern Hemisphere, active-layer thickness was measured at >190 sites in 10 countries in different permafrost zones for at least the last 12 years. In addition to lowland CALM sites active-layer thicknesses are monitored in 20 boreholes in mountainous regions of the Northern Hemisphere (>1300 m elevation). For most CALM sites, standardized metadata is available.
![]() |
Thermal State of Permafrost (TSP)GTN-P Database: Permafrost Temperatures |
The main objective of the Thermal State of Permafrost program is to „obtain a deeper under-standing of the temporal (inter-annual and decadal time scales) and spatial (north to south and west to east) variability and trends in the permafrost temperatures to develop more reliable predictive capabilities for the projection of these changes into the 21st century”. The TSP data set serves as a baseline for the assessment of the rate of change of permafrost temperatures and permafrost distribution, to validate climate model scenarios, and to support process research in order to improve our understanding of permafrost dynamics. The existing permafrost database, previously maintained by the Geological Survey of Canada, has been largely enhanced during the IPY years 2007-2009. This included the establishment of new boreholes (more than half of the Northern Hemisphere boreholes were drilled during the IPY), the integration of existing permafrost observatory sites, and the collection of historical data. The results of this inventory of boreholes were presented in the so-called “TSP Snapshot” (IPA 2010). The TSP Snapshot (IPA 2010) is to date the most complete inventory of TSP boreholes and summary temperature data (MAGT from 2008 and older) worldwide. The boreholes were grouped according to their depths. For some countries, permafrost temperatures with higher temporal resolution are available within national networks and databases. The main source for Alaskan and Russian TSP boreholes is the “Permafrost Lab” of the Geophysical Institute of the UAF, headed by Vladimir Romanovsky. Together with their partners they run and maintain > 200 boreholes, with depths ranging between 1 and 380 m, mainly in Alaska and Russia. The data is available (in daily averages for SU, SH, IB; DB: 1 annual value) via the website of the UAF Permafrost lab or via the CADIS Server of the National Snow and Ice Datacenter (NSIDC). Norwegian and Svalbard data in raw format (hourly values) are at the NORPERM database. Within the polar region of the Northern Hemisphere, ground temperatures are now measured in ~790 boreholes.The main focus for the establishment of new sites was to close geographical gaps in the monitoring network. Air, surface and ground temperature was measured in boreholes ranging from a few meters to depths greater than 125 m.
|
Data User Element (DUE) Permafrost |
The ESA Data User Element (DUE) Permafrost project provides a mid-to-long-term Earth observation service for permafrost remote-sensing derived applications for northern high-latitudinal permafrost areas (north of 55° N). From the beginning, scientific stakeholders and the IPA were actively involved in the project. The DUE Permafrost remote-sensing derived products are key parameters for permafrost research: land surface temperature (LST), surface soil moisture (SSM), frozen/thawed surface status (freeze/thaw), elevation, land cover, and surface waters. The DUE Permafrost consortium consists of five project partners. Each of them is responsible for the development and the evaluation of one or more DUE Permafrost products.
The DUE Permafrost products are provided for the entire permafrost area north of 50° N. Time series of circum-Arctic land surface temperature, frozen/ thawed surface status, and surface soil moisture are provided with weekly and monthly averages from 2007-2010 with 25-km pixel resolution. The global land cover has a spatial resolution of 350 m. The new circum-Arctic DEM dataset north of 50° N has a 100-m pixel resolution. In addition, in order to set up the required validation tasks and information services, a target area approach with five case study regions with higher spatial resolution (pixels ranging from 150 m to 1 km) than the circum-Arctic products were developed. The tests regions are
There is a strong interaction between the ESA DUE Permafrost team and PAGE21. The DUE Permafrost project leader (A. Bartsch) is leader of PAGE21 WP5. B. Heim and K. Elger represent of the AWI Potsdam group within DUE Permafrost. Both and are also strongly involved in PAGE21 (WP8 and WP5). A major component of the project was the evaluation of the DUE Permafrost products to test their scientific validity for high-latitude permafrost landscapes. The evaluation of DUE Permafrost products MODIS Land Surface Temperature and frozen/ thawed surface status (time series) showed very good correlations between satellite and measured ground data (from GTN-P boreholes). This suggests that the DUE Permafrost approach is a promising one for long-term monitoring of permafrost surface conditions. The largest benefit of remote-sensing derived products is to add a spatio-temporal dimension to point measurements taken at monitoring sites.
![]() |
FLUXNET |
FLUXNET is a "network of regional networks" that coordinates regional and global analyses of observations from micrometeorological tower sites. The flux tower sites use eddy covariance methods to measure the exchanges of carbon dioxide (CO2), water vapor, and energy between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere. At present over 500 tower sites are operated on a long-term and continuous basis. They are located in different vegetation zones, including temperate conifer and broadleaved (deciduous and evergreen) forests, tropical and boreal forests, crops, grasslands, chaparral, wetlands and tundra. Sites can be associated with regional or domain networks or can be unaffiliated. Flux towers operate on five continents and their latitudinal distribution ranges from 70° N to 30° S. The FLUXNET database contains information about tower location and site characteristics as well as data availability. Eddy covariance data at 30-minute frequency are typically maintained, not by FLUXNET, but by individual towers or by networks to enable standardized data processing, gap-filling, and formats. FLUXNET, which is a component of NASA's ORNL DAAC (Distributed Active Archive Center), has several primary functions: it
(1) provides infrastructure for a central database of site characteristic data (land cover, climate, meteorology, plant, and soil data);
(2) maintains information about the availability of flux data along with links to the flux data at individual towers or at networks;
(3) archives flux data associated with manuscripts, workshops, as well as site characteristics and ancillary data about flux tower sites;
(4) compiles, archives, and distributes carbon, water and energy flux measurements for unaffiliated sites and others, as requested;
and (5) provides information for evaluating remote sensing products, such as primary productivity, evaporation, albedo, and energy absorption.
In a related effort, the ORNL DAAC provides subsets of remote sensing products (MODIS Land Products) for an area of 7x7 km around each flux tower in the FLUXNET collection. This information can be used as background site characteristic data, to examine ecosystem dynamics, to scale up the findings at tower sites, or to parameterize ecosystem models.
The aim of FLUXNET is to have a coordinated, global, long-term flux net to be able to address hypothesis that could not be addressed with data from a single or even a few flux tower sites. These are
![]() |
INTERACT |
INTERACT is a EU FP7-funded circum-Arctic network of 33 terrestrial field bases in Scandinavia, Russia, the USA, Canada, Greenland, Iceland, the Faroe Islands, and Scotland together with, currently, a further twelve observer stations in Svalbard, Russia, Switzerland, Austria, Poland, the Czech Republic, and Canada. Its main objective is to build capacity for identifying, understanding, predicting and responding to diverse environmental changes throughout the wide environmental and land-use envelopes of the Arctic. Together, the INTERACT stations host many thousands of scientists from around the world working in multiple disciplines, and INTERACT collaborates with many research consortia and international research and monitoring networks. One particular achievement of INTERACT was to bring together for the first time descriptions of the major terrestrial research stations of the north and their activities in the INTERACT Station Catalogue (INTERACT 2012) that will be used as a central resource by PAGE21 because of the strong overlap of PAGE21 primary and secondary sites and INTERACT Stations.
The Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost (GTN‐P) is the primary international programme concerned with monitoring permafrost parameters. GTN‐P was developed in the 1990s by the International Permafrost Association (IPA) under the Global Climate observing System (GCOS) and the Global Terrestrial Observing Network (GTOS), with the longterm goal of obtaining a comprehensive view of the spatial structure, trends and variability of changes in the active layer thickness and permafrost temperature.
GCOS and GTOS established 50 Essential ClimateVariables (ECVs), of which one is permafrost. Within the GTN-P, involving the senior and young permafrost scientific community, two permafrost key variables have been identified as ECV's:
Permanent monitoring in GTN-P have been coordinated by the IPA since their establishment. TSP was originally based at the Geological Survey of Canada in Ottawa (GSC), Canada. The TSP observatories in the United States and Russia have been supported by the US National Science Foundation as well as managed by the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Permafrost temperature data from these observatories are freely available at the dedicated US-Russian TSP website (www.permafrostwatch.org) and from the Advanced Cooperative Arctic Data and Information Service (ACADIS). The latter is a joint effort of the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR), the UNIDATA and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) to provide data archival, preservation and access for all projects, funded by NSF's Arctic Science Program. The CALM program was initially affiliated with and supported by the International Tundra Experiment (ITEX) in 1991. CALM has had operational bases at Rutgers University (1991-94), the State University of New York (1994-97), the University of Cincinnati (1998-2003), the University of Delaware (2003-09) and is currently headquartered at George Washington University. Longterm support for data collection in Alaska and Russia has been provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation and data from all CALM sites are available through a dedicated CALM web site and the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colorado.
Download Strategy and Implementation Plan 2012-2016
Framework of GTN-P Management Structure by GTN-P Strategy and Implementation Plan 2012-2016 |
created by the Secretariat and the Steering Commitee, 19.09.2015
The Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost (GTN-P) governance structure aims to coordinate, manage, support and promote the GCOS and IPA initiative to monitor the thermal state of permafrost, which currently includes the active layer thickness and ground temperature in all permafrost regions of the Earth. GTN-P frames and adapts the best monitoring strategies and standards for permafrost monitoring in the context of existing and new developments in nature, science and technology. Members of the GTN-P governing board represent a wide palette of specialties involved in permafrost observation as well as specialists of data management.
The GTN-P governing board consists of the Steering Committee, the Advisory Board and the Secretariat.
Meetings of the full GTN-P governing board may be called if:
a) Requested by the Executive Committee, or
b) Requested by a majority of Advisory Board members, or
c) Requested by the Secretariat.
![]() |
Governance Structure |
• the Steering Committee (SC) is the Governing body of GTN-P
• the Steering Committee consists of not more than six members which are jointly nominated by leading GCOS, IPA and GTN-P representatives and the scientific community
• members of the SC are renewed every four years; re-election is possible
• activities of the SC are managed by the SC Chair, which is elected by the SC
• the SC meets approximately annually to assess the state of the international monitoring of permafrost
• the SC reviles the issues and establishes the agenda about which the Advisory Board shall be consulted
• the SC reports approximately annually on the GTN-P activities to the funding agencies and umbrella organizations of the GCOS and the IPA
• the Advisory Board is the body that provides non-binding strategic advice and scientific expertise to the management of GTN-P
• representatives to the Board are jointly nominated by the GTN-P Steering Committee, the IPA Steering Committee and the GTN-P Secretariat
• it will serve for four-year renewable terms, and will normally communicate electronically
• the Advisory Board advises the GTN-P, GCOS and IPA initiatives concerning present practice and future developments of the monitoring of permafrost, and also on the delivery of datasets to the wider permafrost community
• it periodically evaluates the work of the GTN-P Steering Committee and the GTN-P Secretariat in approximately four-year interval
• the Secretariat is the executing body that is managing the current business of the GTN-P
• the Secretariat is nominated by the GTN-P Steering Committee
• members of the Secretariat are renewed every four years; re-election is possible
• the Secretariat is responsible for the dialogue and linkages with other organizations, the periodic reporting and release of products for GTN-P and the financial management including fundraising
• it is responsible for the data management including integration, standardization, quality control, formatting, archiving and publishing of the GTN-P data
• activities are coordinated by the Director
• the Technical Director is responsible for the data management system
• the Secretariat coordinates the cooperation between the umbrella organizations of the GCOS and the IPA (led by the network coordinator)
• members communicate electronically on a regular basis
• members support the GTN-P Database and maintain the Data Management System
• it communicates with and supports the National Correspondents of GTN-P to facilitate the upload and quality control of TSP and CALM data to the GTN-P Database
• it reports annually to the Steering Committee and the Advisory Board about the status of the GTN-P Database and produce policy-relevant bulletins on GTN-P outputs
• National Correspondents (NC) are proposed by the IPA national Adhering Bodies
• NC foster the implementation of the GTN-P strategy in their country
• NC are responsible for stimulating and coordinating the collection of data, quality control, and reporting by the individual investigators
• NC maintain close contacts with relevant institutions and funding agencies in their country and the IPA national Adhering Bodies